Missouri Farm Organization Enters Fray Over Proposed Livestock Rules

Rhonda Perry (photo: Mo.
Rural Crisis Center)
One Montana newspaper described the rancher response to proposed USDA rules as a "David vs. Goliath movement on to take action for fair market prices against corporate concentration." Missouri Rural Crisis Center's own Rhonda Perry added that "Missouri lost 90 percent of hog farmers since 1985. They (corporations) came in and said this was the wave of the future...." Perry attributed the drastic decline in locally owned farms and ranches to corporate consolidation, adding that consumer prices have increased.

In an unusual display of supporting the "little guy," twenty-one US senators, including Missouri's Claire McCaskill, have signed on to a letter advocating for changes to USDA livestock rules [PDF] that will be the "first step towards leveling the playing field between producers and the packers." The list of senators includes 19 Democrats, 1 Republican, and 1 independent, though another Republican, Senator Bill Bullard, supported the rules change "to restore a fair and just market that will provide economic opportunities for all livestock producers...."

Rhonda Perry, a livestock and grain farmer from Howard County, Missouri, went further than the Senators' support for rules changes: "Now is the time for action. Family farmers and livestock producers need to make their voices heard over the well-heeled lobbyists of the meatpackers. Independent hog and cattle producers in Missouri commend Senator McCaskill for signing-on to the letter and standing up for Missouri's family farmers in support of the rules."

Photo: Food First
Perry participated in meetings in Ft. Collins, Colorado and Redwood Falls, Montana, speaking for the Missouri Rural Crisis Center. The center, based in Columbia, Missouri, has sought to "preserve family farms, promote stewardship of the land and environmental integrity, and strive for economic and social justice by building unity and mutual understanding among diverse groups, both rural and urban" since 1985.

Judging by the level of opposition to the rules changes by large corporate meat producers like Cargill with $108 billion annual revenue, the rules must be favorable to local, small-to-midsize ranchers. However, an AP article in the Friday, August 27, 2010 Kansas City Star seems to indicate that ranchers were evenly divided over the rules changes. A quick check of articles indicate what advocacy organizations like Western Organization of Resource Councils in Montana and Missouri Rural Crisis Center are promoting. "I'm tired of waiting for the government to do something," says Gilles Stockton, a rancher from Montana. "It's stupid to keep arguing whether there is a problem -- it's obvious there is a problem. We need action from the USDA and DOJ to restore competition in the cattle industry."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Community Media: Serving More Than a Geographic Region

Lee's Summit Proposes the Sanity Approach to Waste Reduction

Proposed Cuts to Food Assistance Point to a “Perform Storm”